Re: [EVDL] EV Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36

2020-04-30 Thread Lee Hart via EV
Mr. Sharkey via EV wrote: > Use parts and methods with a *proven* > reliability record; not whatever is cheap and handy. Cheap And Handy is my alternate identity in the workshop!! ;) I resemble that remark! Cheap and Handy are my two "helpers" in the shop. ;-) But there are things I'll

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread Lee Hart via EV
Jan Steinman via EV wrote: The fashionable way to balance is by switching a resistor (or some equivalent) across the cells if they get high while charging. Seems like a job for power MOSFETs, no? Then, you'd have a voltage-variable resistor that could handle the boundary conditions you

[EVDL] Tesla in the news again

2020-04-30 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
Tesla is facing another lawsuit over autopilot. Newsweek reports that a Japanese family are suing Tesla for a accident 2 years ago in which a 44 year old pedestrian was struck and killed. https://www.newsweek.com/tesla-lawsuit-model-x-autopilot-fatal-crash-japan- yoshihiro-umeda-1501114

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread Jan Steinman via EV
> From: Lee Hart > > The fashionable way to balance is by switching a resistor (or some > equivalent) across the cells if they get high while charging. Seems like a job for power MOSFETs, no? Then, you'd have a voltage-variable resistor that could handle the boundary conditions you cited.

Re: [EVDL] EV Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36

2020-04-30 Thread Mr. Sharkey via EV
> Use parts and methods with a *proven* > reliability record; not whatever is cheap and handy. Cheap And Handy is my alternate identity in the workshop!! ;) ___ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE:

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
As a non-engineer I don't have much to contribute to this discussion. However, I might point out that from what I've read you're talking about designing a BMS for EVhobbyists, not for production EVs. IMO, that calls for a somewhat less stringent level of fault tolerance. Safety is still

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread Lee Hart via EV
Lawrence Winiarski via EV wrote: Suppose you run a single wire out to 150 different batteries and you have a good system. Suppose ONE of those 300 different connections goes bad... Wouldn't it be nice to be able to have an alternate method of communication... that didn't cost anything extra

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread Lee Hart via EV
Peter C. Thompson via EV wrote: In a bus system (USB, CANbus, etc.) any failed device takes out the entire system. Actually not correct. CAN BUS works if a unit fails - UNLESS that unit is blasting data on the bus. But, that is one of the failure modes. It could also fail by shorting the

Re: [EVDL] Communicating over "mains" (Was: Minibms?)

2020-04-30 Thread Peter C. Thompson via EV
On 4/29/20 6:46 PM, Lee Hart via EV wrote: Peri Hartman via EV wrote: - Is it a safety system, there to prevent damage and fires?     (battery SAFETY system) Doesn't matter. It can still be handled by a poll from a master. For this to work, both the master and all the slaves have to be