Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

Am 24.10.2016 um 12:11 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer: > Hi, > > Am 24.10.2016 um 09:11 schrieb Moser Helmut: >> Can anybody here please answer the original question (besides tips about >> distro change)? >> It's very important for me too to know what to do after November 1st as I >> have several

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

icht- > Von: Evergreen [mailto:evergreen-boun...@lists.rosenauer.org] Im Auftrag von > Sebastian Niemeyer > Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016 15:59 > An: oS Evergreen > Betreff: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01 > > Hallo together, > > how are th

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

On 2016-10-24 09:11, Moser Helmut wrote: > Hello all, > > Can anybody here please answer the original question (besides tips about > distro change)? > It's very important for me too to know what to do after November 1st as I > have several 13.1 machines sitting there. The more or less official

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

[mailto:evergreen-boun...@lists.rosenauer.org] Im Auftrag von Sebastian Niemeyer Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016 15:59 An: oS Evergreen Betreff: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01 Hallo together, how are the plans for openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01. Is there a change for a longer support

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

Am Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016, 22:49:26 schrieb Felix Miata: > > Me, I think something else would be easier, perhaps ubuntu. > > Ubuntu *is* (a) Debian (derivative), just with a custom set of personality > modifications designed for shielding its users from the underlying power of > FOSS, e.g.

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

Carlos E.R. composed on 2016-10-24 05:09 (UTC+0200): On 24/10/2016 4:49, Felix Miata wrote: Carlos E.R. composed on 2016-10-24 04:27 (UTC+0200): Me, I think something else would be easier, perhaps ubuntu. Ubuntu *is* (a) Debian (derivative), just with a custom set of personality

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

On 24/10/2016 4:49, Felix Miata wrote: Carlos E.R. composed on 2016-10-24 04:27 (UTC+0200): Me, I think something else would be easier, perhaps ubuntu. Ubuntu *is* (a) Debian (derivative), just with a custom set of personality modifications designed for shielding its users from the

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

Carlos E.R. composed on 2016-10-24 04:27 (UTC+0200): Me, I think something else would be easier, perhaps ubuntu. Ubuntu *is* (a) Debian (derivative), just with a custom set of personality modifications designed for shielding its users from the underlying power of FOSS, e.g. Unity (aka only

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

On 24/10/2016 3:32, Felix Miata wrote: Carlos E.R. composed on 2016-10-24 02:31 (UTC+0200): OTOH, abandoning YaST2 for (nothing) and Zypper (particularly its package locking mechanism besides its overall thoughful design) for the various Apt-based alternatives would likely be, at the least

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

* Carlos E.R. [10-23-16 20:34]: > On 23/10/2016 17:50, Axel Braun wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016, 16:10:10 schrieb Carlos E. R.: > > > > how are the plans for openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01. Is there a change > > > > for a longer support of the current evergreen

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

On 23/10/2016 17:50, Axel Braun wrote: Am Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016, 16:10:10 schrieb Carlos E. R.: how are the plans for openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01. Is there a change for a longer support of the current evergreen release? I'm daunted by the perspectives. Either I buy new 64 bit hardware

Re: [Evergreen] openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01

On 2016-10-23 15:59, Sebastian Niemeyer wrote: > Hallo together, > > how are the plans for openSUSE 13.1 after 2016-11-01. Is there a change for a > longer support of the current evergreen release? I'm daunted by the perspectives. Either I buy new 64 bit hardware to replace my old 32 bit