Re: [Evergreen] Can you help me with a bugzilla that was closed as invalid because it is about 13.1?
On 2016-05-20 13:56, Patrick Schaaf wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> Well, now they have removed all the libreoffice repos for 13.1. :-( > > Last update was late in January, anyway. I wouldn't blame anybody for > that, really. The evergreen "promise" never did cover all the various > extra repositories, AFAIK. The Evergreen people, as few as they are, do a lot. But the maintainers of many extra repos are very fast on removing repositories that "just work" and should be easy to keep, IMHO. > I've been running local mirrors of the repositories for some years > now, and use them for all installs and updates, so it's not a big > issue to me. Yes, I also have local copies of all the repos I use. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Evergreen mailing list Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
Re: [Evergreen] Can you help me with a bugzilla that was closed as invalid because it is about 13.1?
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote: > Well, now they have removed all the libreoffice repos for 13.1. :-( Last update was late in January, anyway. I wouldn't blame anybody for that, really. The evergreen "promise" never did cover all the various extra repositories, AFAIK. I've been running local mirrors of the repositories for some years now, and use them for all installs and updates, so it's not a big issue to me. best regards Patrick ___ Evergreen mailing list Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
Re: [Evergreen] Can you help me with a bugzilla that was closed as invalid because it is about 13.1?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, 2016-05-02 at 16:24 +0200, Patrick Schaaf wrote: On Monday 02 May 2016 16:12:03 Carlos E. R. wrote: Hi, I reported it last november, against LibreOffice ir repo 4.3. It has been closed now becasue they say that they don't keep that repo. So I reopen it against repo 5.0, and again they close it as invalid because 13.1 is out of maintenance. Absurd! The bug is not present in any other distro, it is just a missing pacakge from the repo and should be easy to solve. Jup, experienced that too - we solved it locally by enabling both the 4.3 libreoffice repo, where these packages are still present, and the 5.0 repo. Well, now they have removed all the libreoffice repos for 13.1. :-( - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlc++UAACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WcRQCfXX1XoB537RnH/TkyEErWEXay LVMAn3qrPVVHp2xs8hVagtm3rlTk9S9N =J01C -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Evergreen mailing list Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
Re: [Evergreen] Can you help me with a bugzilla that was closed as invalid because it is about 13.1?
On Monday 02 May 2016 16:12:03 Carlos E. R. wrote: > Hi, > > I reported it last november, against LibreOffice ir repo 4.3. It has > been closed now becasue they say that they don't keep that repo. > > So I reopen it against repo 5.0, and again they close it as invalid > because 13.1 is out of maintenance. > > Absurd! The bug is not present in any other distro, it is just a missing > pacakge from the repo and should be easy to solve. Jup, experienced that too - we solved it locally by enabling both the 4.3 libreoffice repo, where these packages are still present, and the 5.0 repo. > I'm starting to think that they will close any bug I report because its > me. I reported a few weeks back something else, it was refused > unpolitely (solve it yourself if you want), then I saw an update that > covered what I had reported :-( Don't worry. I had the same experience (regarding a systemd bug report, after the 210 upgrade fiasco, there are still several of these pending). I stopped perusing bugzilla, and go on baking my own workarounds for now. My time is too short for begging in bug reports. best regards Patrick ___ Evergreen mailing list Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
