RE: Numbers

2006-03-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 1Z > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 1:09 AM > To: Everything List > Subject: Re: Numbers > > > > Georges Quénot wrote: > > > That too can be discussed. It is not so sure

Re: Numbers

2006-03-22 Thread Georges Quénot
peterdjones wrote: > > Georges Quénot wrote: > >> That too can be discussed. It is not so sure that there >> exist a set of equations of which a HP universe would >> be a solution, especially if this universe must also >> include a counterpart of me. > > As I have pointed out, there is bound t

Re: Numbers

2006-03-22 Thread Quentin Anciaux
Hi Le Mercredi 22 Mars 2006 15:09, 1Z a écrit : > As I have pointed out, there is bound to be an equation to which > any given number is the solution. I don't understand this, could you explain a little bit more and/or point to the post where you discuss it ? > > > > -- in a broad sense of "I

Re: Numbers

2006-03-22 Thread 1Z
Georges Quénot wrote: > That too can be discussed. It is not so sure that there > exist a set of equations of which a HP universe would > be a solution, especially if this universe must also > include a counterpart of me. As I have pointed out, there is bound to be an equation to which any giv

Re: Numbers

2006-03-22 Thread Georges Quenot
Georges Quenot a écrit : SKIP > I consider the possibility that mind emerges from matter > activity. I think that modern physics and the synthetic > theory of evolution provide a resonable (though partial) > account for the "technical" capabilities of the human > mind. What remains unclear to me