Another categorization of this dichotomy could be the Plato universals
corresponding to Intensional definitions and the possible, vs. the
Aristotle particulars corresponding to the Extensional definitions and
the actual. The Intensional can also be associated with mathematical
descriptions an
Hi,
Le Mercredi 5 Avril 2006 22:07, John M a écrit :
> Stephen:
>
> right on! (onwards, of course).
> I did not mention the arts. Express "art" by numbers
> and you killed the art.
It is not a question to describe art by numbers... I'd say it is totally
unrelated, in a materialistic view don't
Stephen:
right on! (onwards, of course).
I did not mention the arts. Express "art" by numbers
and you killed the art. Maybe I misunderstand the
idea, but a representation by (any kind and length of)
numbers is (in my mind at least) rational. Art is not.
Emotions (some of them) are not necessari
Le 04-avr.-06, à 19:31, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Le 01-avr.-06, à 19:18, 1Z a écrit :
> ...
>>
>> If you believe in absolute QM (or just assume absolute QM I eman QM
>> without wave collapse) then, obviously, observers are subject to the
>> SWE, and are multiplied or
4 matches
Mail list logo