Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
So your theory is that the electromagnetic field has an ability to learn
which is not reflected in QED - it's some hitherto unknown aspect of the
field and it doesn't show up in the field violating Maxwell's equations
or
QED predictions? And further this aspect
Colin Hales writes:
Stathis wrote:
I can understand that, for example, a computer simulation of a storm is
not a storm, because only a storm is a storm and will get you wet. But
perhaps counterintuitively, a model of a brain can be closer to the real
thing than a model of a storm. We don't
Le 16-déc.-06, à 03:49, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Bruno Marchal writes:
Le 15-déc.-06, à 02:04, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Who says the Nazis are wrong when they assert they are good?
I was not saying that they were wrong. I was saying that they were
bad.
Who says this? All
Tom Caylor wrote:
One thing Schaeffer did was remind us that the assumptions of nature
and cause were foundational to modern science.
More prevalent on the Christian Right is the Dominionist idea, shared
by Reconstructionists, that Christians alone are Biblically mandated to
occupy all
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 16-déc.-06, à 03:49, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Bruno Marchal writes:
Le 15-déc.-06, à 02:04, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
...
We could look at a particular incident where capital punishment was
proposed, let's say
for murder. Everyone might agree on the
Brent,
now that Wei Dai reincarnated me to the list, I hurry to agree with you
(almost).
Good/bad is not only a personal Whahooh (Yahoo??) but it is a culture
related (changeable) set of value-judgments.
*
Re: capital punishment:
1. it is not a punishment because after the fact the punished has
John Mikes wrote:
Brent,
now that Wei Dai reincarnated me to the list, I hurry to agree with you
(almost).
Good/bad is not only a personal Whahooh (Yahoo??) but it is a culture
related (changeable) set of value-judgments.
*
Re: capital punishment:
1. it is not a punishment because
No need for escape - some offenders manage to convince us they are good to
be let out - only to re offend. For some crimes this is manageable but for
others !!
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Meeker
Sent: 16
So the EM fields account for the experiences that accompany the brain
processes. A kind of epiphenomena.
So why don't my experiences change when I'm in an MRI?
I haven't been through the detail - I hope to verify this in my
simulations to come but...
As far as I am aware MRI magnets
Democratic system are
more
efficient to explore the political landscape and thus more efficient
in
probability to satisfy soul's natural attraction toward the good.
The soul's natural attraction towards the good might be compared to
the body's
natural attraction to keep dry.
John Mikes writes:
Re: capital punishment:
1. it is not a punishment because after the fact the punished has no way to
be sorry or to improve.
2. punishing is a vengeance-related hypocritical self-aggrandisement assigned
to gods and god-like feelings in humans.
3. I agree to discontinue
I understand your conclusion, that a model of a brain
won't be able to handle novelty like a real brain,
but I am trying to understand the nuts and
bolts of how the model is going to fail. For
example, you can say that perpetual motion
machines are impossible because they disobey
the
Colin Hales writes:
I understand your conclusion, that a model of a brain
won't be able to handle novelty like a real brain,
but I am trying to understand the nuts and
bolts of how the model is going to fail. For
example, you can say that perpetual motion
machines are impossible
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Colin Hales writes:
I understand your conclusion, that a model of a brain
won't be able to handle novelty like a real brain,
but I am trying to understand the nuts and
bolts of how the model is going to fail. For
example, you can say that perpetual motion
14 matches
Mail list logo
