Information content of multiverse

2007-07-09 Thread Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
Hi everybody, While I was reading the previous discussion; justifying theory of everything , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of our TOE. The problem is: Multiverse by itself is a choice, and every choice by it's nature has some bias and information. I could just consider

Re: Information content of multiverse

2007-07-09 Thread Jason
On Jul 9, 1:39 am, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, While I was reading the previous discussion; justifying theory of everything , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of our TOE. The problem is: Multiverse by itself is a choice, and every choice

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread Torgny Tholerus
David Nyman skrev: Consequently we can't 'interview' B-Universe objects. It is true that we can not interview objects in B-Universe. One object in one universe can not affect any object in some other universe. But we can look at the objects in an other universe. Just in the same way

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread Torgny Tholerus
Bruno Marchal skrev: Le 05-juil.-07, 14:19, Torgny Tholerus wrote: David Nyman skrev: You have however drawn our attention to something very interesting and important IMO. This concerns the necessary entailment of 'existence'. 1. The relation

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread David Nyman
On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One object in one universe can not affect any object in some other universe. But we can look at the objects in an other universe. I would say that the conjunction of the above two sentences is a contradiction. Because everything that

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread torgny
On Jul 9, 7:47 pm, David Nyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because everything that happens in A-Universe will also happen in B-Universe. All objects in A-Universe obey the laws of physics, and all objects in B-Universe obey the same

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread torgny
(Reposted because of some techical problems...) On Jul 7, 2:00 pm, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le 05-juil.-07, à 14:19, Torgny Tholerus wrote: David Nyman skrev: You have however drawn our attention to something very interesting and important IMO. This concerns the

Re: Asifism revisited.

2007-07-09 Thread David Nyman
On 09/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There can be no dynamic time. In the space-time, time is always static. Then you must get very bored ;) David On Jul 9, 7:47 pm, David Nyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: