David Nyman skrev:
On 09/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There can be no dynamic time. In the space-time, time is always
static.
Then you must get very bored ;)
David
But I am not bored, because I don't know what will happen tomorrow. If
I look
On 7/9/07, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:39 am, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
While I was reading the previous discussion; justifying theory of
everything , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of
our
TOE. The problem is:
On 10/07/07, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am not bored
I'm glad to hear you're not a zombie after all :)
If I look at our universe from the outside
I'd like to know how you perform this feat.
I see that I will do something
tomorrow
I don't doubt it. But this is my
On Jul 6, 2:56 pm, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It
is a unexpected (by me) discovery that quanta belongs to that sharable
first person view (making the comp-QM a bit more psychological than
some Many-Worlder would perhaps appreciate.
Doesn't this strike you as perhaps consistent
David Nyman wrote:
On Jul 6, 2:56 pm, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It
is a unexpected (by me) discovery that quanta belongs to that sharable
first person view (making the comp-QM a bit more psychological than
some Many-Worlder would perhaps appreciate.
Doesn't this strike you
On 10/07/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I draw a complete blank when I read your use of the word reflexive. What
exactly do you mean? How would you distinguish reflexive from non-reflexive
existence? Do numbers exist reflexively? Do somethiings exist
non-reflexively? What
x list for life coding of events (ideas and announcements) and
discussion of life coding practice.
Subscription: https://www.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/x
Life coding is a mapping of the descriptive means of hardware and
programming onto the world, a concern with an interiority of the
David Nyman wrote:
On 10/07/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I draw a complete blank when I read your use of the word reflexive. What
exactly do you mean? How would you distinguish reflexive from non-reflexive
existence? Do numbers exist reflexively? Do somethiings exist
On 11/07/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see that relexive adding anything here. It's just existence
simpliciter isn't it?
Frankly, I'd be happy to concur. My account was to some extent a
recapitulation of the intuitive process by which I reached a view of
this entailment
9 matches
Mail list logo
