Hi Russell:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Hal Ruhl wrote:
>>
>> Hi Russell:
>>
>> In response to Jason you wrote:
>>
>>>An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded
>>>in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve
>>>state change,
>
>>
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
> Hi Russell:
>
> In response to Jason you wrote:
>
> >An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded
> >in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve
> >state change,
>
> In my model a unive
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: Malcom/Standish white rabbit solution
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:27:50PM +0100, Alastair Malcolm wrote:
>> >
>> > I use universe and history,
Dear Bruno,
>> The things I am unclear about are:
>> 1) maximally complete computational histories going through a state ->
>> what are these?
> We assume comp ok? So for example, my current relative mind state can
> be associated with a computational state. By Church thesis, this state
> is
4 matches
Mail list logo