Bruno Marchal wrote:
Honestly I think you are a bit dishonest to yourself here, since you
already
presume the appearance of matter,
I assume nowhere primitive matter. I do assume consensual reality.
If not, I would not post message on a list.
Well, that was my point. So indeed
As a tyro, I'm wondering whether this is just a summary of what physicists
already know or a genuine conceptual breakthrough.marty a.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3433.pdf
any comments on
Not to hijack my thread, but even if Physics is just a subbranch of
PA, I have difficulty conceiving of numerical computations happening
without matter/energy.
Ronald
On Dec 19, 12:08 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
*Reality **versions(?)* continued...
Dear Ronald,
The theory is pure unadulterated Idealism. Matter/energy are, at best,
considered as epiphenomena. My efferts to discuss alternatives have lead
nowhere...
Onward!
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com
To: Everything List
4 matches
Mail list logo
