Bruno:
Does the following relate at all to your theory of Comp?
Each life is an equation. Each person is given parts of the equation with
many variables on both sides of the equals sign.
Most equations have only one solution which, however, can be solved in
different ways: simple
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Charles charlesrobertgood...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 23, 8:42 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I think
it's an example of the radiation arrow of time making a time-reversed
process impossible - or maybe just vanishingly improbable. Bruce
On Feb 25, 6:41 am, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, this is the mainstream point of view, not unique to Price. It's
generally thought that reason we see an arrow of time at the macroscopic
level--including the arrow of time inherent in the fact that we can look at
records in the
On Feb 26, 6:38 am, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
One approach to the problem that I heard regarding the arrow of time
relates to the fact that storing information (either by the brain or
in a DNA molecule in the course of evolution) requires the expendature
of energy. The
On Feb 23, 9:02 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
But recent analysis produced by neuroimaging technologies has revealed
something quite remarkable: a great deal of meaningful activity is occurring
in the brain when a person is sitting back and doing nothing at all.
The best
Charles wrote:
On Feb 25, 6:41 am, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, this is the mainstream point of view, not unique to Price. It's
generally thought that reason we see an arrow of time at the macroscopic
level--including the arrow of time inherent in the fact that we can look at
On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Charles charlesrobertgood...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 26, 6:38 am, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
One approach to the problem that I heard regarding the arrow of time
relates to the fact that storing information (either by the brain or
in a DNA
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:17 AM, David Nyman david.ny...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2010 07:03, Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
With this in mind, I'm not sure what you mean by two undeniably
manifest perpectives. Only ONE seems undeniable to me, and that's
1-p.
My proposal is
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rex Allen
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:31 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: On the computability of consciousness
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:17
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Rex and Members,
There is a very compelling body of work in logic that allows for
circularity. Please take a look at:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/m06t7w0163945350/
and
On Feb 26, 10:34 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
But isn't the EPR experiment a way of avoiding a past constraint. The
past constraint is just that the net angular momentum is zero, so there
is no constraint on the polarization of either photon. When one is
measured it can
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
Is hard determinism as bad an outcome as solipsism? If not, why not?
I don't know about good or bad - but since you post on the internet I infer
that you are not a solipist.
Since posting on the
On Feb 26, 2:05 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't the AOT explained in terms of probability? E.g. There are far
more combinations for a system to be disordered rather than ordered,
as such the universe overall will tend to fall into these more likely
configurations. You
Charles wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:05 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't the AOT explained in terms of probability? E.g. There are far
more combinations for a system to be disordered rather than ordered,
as such the universe overall will tend to fall into these more likely
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2010 14:46, Charles charlesrobertgood...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I agree that the statement evolution has programmed us to
think of ourselves as a single individual, etc is rather contentious
as
On Feb 26, 6:19 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
That isn't an explanation for the AOT, it's a consequence of it. An
explanation for the AOT would require showing *why* the universe is in
an improbable state in the past.
If it were in an improbable state in the future, the
Schulmann has written a nice little book about this considering both a
classical and quantum universe.
/Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement/. L. S. Schulman. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1997
Thank you, if I have worlds enough and time (and money) I will get a
copy.
Charles
--
On Feb 26, 10:34 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
But isn't the EPR experiment a way of avoiding a past constraint. The
past constraint is just that the net angular momentum is zero, so there
is no constraint on the polarization of either photon. When one is
measured it can
18 matches
Mail list logo
