On Nov 18, 6:31 am, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 04:51, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
? Are you saying that it is obvious
On Nov 19, 3:11 am, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Rex,
Your post reminded me of the quote (of which I cannot recall the source)
where someone asked Who pushes who around inside the brain?, meaning is it
On Nov 18, 5:10 am, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:38 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 16, 3:27 am, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
If logic and reason reduce to causal laws, then ultimately causal laws
alone explain the result.
On 19 Nov 2010, at 13:36, 1Z wrote:
We don't invoke thought and reason to explain the abilities and
behavior of chess playing computers
Sometimes we do...see Dennett;s intentional stance
key point, I agree. I would say we always do that. No one will explain
why a chess playing computers
On 11/19/2010 6:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Nov 2010, at 06:10, Rex Allen wrote:
In this case, if we had sufficient mental capacity there would no need
to think in terms of trees or forests - we could think exclusively in
terms quarks, electrons, photons, and whatnot. Thinking in
5 matches
Mail list logo
