On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 21 Nov 2010, at 19:47, Rex Allen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
But your reasoning does not apply to free will in the sense I gave: the
ability to choose among
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
But I also deny that mechanism can account for consciousness (except
by fiat declaration that it does).
Rex,
I am interested in your reasoning against mechanism. Assume there is were
an] mechanical brain composed of
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:50 PM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com wrote:
Jason:
I see what you are saying up at our level of understanding, I do not
know how to present that in a technically convincing matter.
Ronald
Which message in
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:12 PM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 21, 6:43 pm, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:36 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
No-one is. They are just valid descriptions. There is no argument
to the effect that logic is causal
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:20 PM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 21, 6:35 pm, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 6:31 am, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is a reason, then the reason
5 matches
Mail list logo