That's a refreshingly new take on evolution!
At least, I can say for myself that my preference for junk food is evolving
to a preference for fruits and vegetables :)
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
If evolution by natural selection were correct, then
That's a refreshingly new take on evolution!
At least, I can say for myself that my preference for junk food is evolving
to a preference for fruits and vegetables :)
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
If evolution by natural selection were correct, then
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jun 2011, at 01:56, Rex Allen wrote:
Related to the Progress and Happiness thread:
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/this-is-the-dream-time.html
But I am not sure there will be a point where everything worth
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Pilar Morales
pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject title. My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
Even something that IS good for us will cause less
On 23 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Rex Allen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Pilar Morales
pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject title.
My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex Allen
rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/21/2011 8:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But comp denies that we can prove that a machine can think. Of course we
can prove that some machine has this or that competence. But for
intelligence/consciousness, this is not
On 23 Jun 2011, at 17:40, Rex Allen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 22 Jun 2011, at 01:56, Rex Allen wrote:
Related to the Progress and Happiness thread:
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/this-is-the-dream-time.html
But I am not
On 6/23/2011 9:27 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Pilar Morales
pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject title. My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex Allenrexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 Jun 2011, at 19:29, Rex Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 6/21/2011 8:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But comp denies that we can prove that a machine can think. Of
course we
can prove that some machine has this or that competence. But
On 23 Jun 2011, at 20:25, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/23/2011 9:27 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Pilar Morales
pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject
title. My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex
On 6/23/2011 10:29 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/21/2011 8:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But comp denies that we can prove that a machine can think. Of course we
can prove that some machine has this or that competence.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM, benjayk
benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:08 PM, benjayk
benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
If evolution by natural selection were correct, then it seems to me
that if the
First off, I want to say it's really pleasant and interesting to communicate
with you. You are a really open minded guy and you are very sincere in
communicating ideas that can lead people (and society) to more freedom,
without pretending to know it all. I really appreciate that. :)
Bruno
Jason Resch-2 wrote:
I've posted this link before, and it is a long read, but I think it is a
great piece which shows what technology ultimately can accomplish:
http://frombob.to/you/aconvers.html
I like the story.
In my opinion it potrays advanced beings too much like human beings with
On 6/23/2011 12:36 PM, benjayk wrote:
To the latter I absolutely agree. Rules will always be broken.
But rules won't eliminate fierce competition. It won't just dissapear,
either. It will be superseded by an deeper ability to cooperate that is
brought about mainly by technology.
It is not
meekerdb wrote:
On 6/23/2011 12:36 PM, benjayk wrote:
To the latter I absolutely agree. Rules will always be broken.
But rules won't eliminate fierce competition. It won't just dissapear,
either. It will be superseded by an deeper ability to cooperate that is
brought about mainly by
Hi Bruno, thanks for your comments... see below.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Comp requires only that you can imagine surviving with an artificial digital
brain. Then a reasoning shows that your consciousness is more attached to
all the possible
17 matches
Mail list logo
