On 10/31/2011 11:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Why? Everett shows convincingly that, being a memory machine, when we measure a
superposition state, we just entangle ourself with the superposition state, but this
differentiate the consciousness/memory of the machine, and she can feel the split.
On 10/31/2011 10:59 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/29/2011 5:59 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
[SPK]
From what I can tell, cul de sac's would have 3p consequences that
would have an effect on the distribution of branches. Maybe we should
consider what effect the 'rest of the universe' has on the
On 31 Oct 2011, at 18:13, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/31/2011 6:01 AM, Nick Prince wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:30 am, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/30/2011 5:13 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:56 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
My point about the unitary evolution was that the clicking of the
Geiger count
On 10/29/2011 5:59 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
[SPK]
From what I can tell, cul de sac's would have 3p consequences that
would have an effect on the distribution of branches. Maybe we should
consider what effect the 'rest of the universe' has on the 1p of the cat.
Onward!
Stephen
[NP]
Had a
On 10/31/2011 6:01 AM, Nick Prince wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:30 am, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/30/2011 5:13 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:56 pm, Russell Standishwrote:
My point about the unitary evolution was that the clicking of the
Geiger counter is not a unitary process - and until you
On 30 Oct 2011, at 10:34, benjayk wrote:
Nick Prince-2 wrote:
This is similar to my speculations in an earlier topic post
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/browse_thread/thread/4514b50b8eb469c3/c49c3aa24c265a4b?lnk=gst&q=homomorphic#c49c3aa24c265a4b
where I suggest that very
On 31 Oct 2011, at 06:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/30/2011 5:09 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
A common response to the idea of QTI is, Why should I care if I die
and someone else in another world who thinks he is me survives? But
this objection shows a lack of understanding of consciousness w
On Oct 31, 5:30 am, meekerdb wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 5:13 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 30, 8:56 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >> My point about the unitary evolution was that the clicking of the
> >> Geiger counter is not a unitary process - and until you hear it, you
> >> remain i
On 31 Oct 2011, at 06:30, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/30/2011 5:13 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:56 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
My point about the unitary evolution was that the clicking of the
Geiger counter is not a unitary process - and until you hear it,
you remain in
superposition.
9 matches
Mail list logo