On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Something is not primitive if you can derive it from something simpler.
>
You don't think the electron is primitive, so show me how to derive its
mass, spin, and electrical charge from something simpler.
John K Clark
--
You received this message
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 Stephen P. King wrote:
> > This quantization of time is easily seen as problematic when we consider
> that SR tells us that any granulation of time is equivalent to a grnulation
> of space which has observable effect.
>
All physicists agree that neither Special Relativity
On 6/23/2012 1:53 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 10:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/23/2012 12:37 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 6:49 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/22/2012 8:04 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 4:49 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hameroff is a crackpot. If microtubles we
On 23 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 22.06.2012 08:03 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 6/22/2012 1:50 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
I have many questions.
One is "what if truth were malleable?" --
HI Brian,
If it was malleable, how would we detect the modifications? If our
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:55, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 11:42 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
You don't need 1p-indeterminacy for this. The independance requires
only that if a brain support consciousness in a particular
computation not using neuron 323, and if physical supervenience is
true,
On 22.06.2012 08:03 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 6/22/2012 1:50 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
I have many questions.
One is "what if truth were malleable?" --
HI Brian,
If it was malleable, how would we detect the modifications? If our
"standards" of truth varied, how could we tell? Thi
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:42, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/22/2012 4:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Jun 2012, at 21:32, Stephen P. King wrote:
What does first person indeterminacy show other than the
independence of the process that generates the 1p from any
particular case of physical s
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 12:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
2) The fact that there is no algorithm to decide if a program
compute some function does not ential that we cannot recognize what
do some program.
You mean there is no algorithm that, given any program
8 matches
Mail list logo