Brent,
thanks for your clear ideas - not controversial to what I try to explain in
my poor wordings.
No proof is "valid", or "true". Applicable, maybe.
In our 'makebilieve' world-model many facets SEEM true in our terms of
explanation, i.e. using conventional science and wisdom. Mathematicians are
Russell wrote:
*"...When it comes to Bp & p capturing the notion of knowledge, I can see it
captures the notion of mathematical knowledge, ie true theorems, as opposed
to true conjectures, say, which aren't knowledge.
But I am vaguely sceptical it captures the notion of scientific knowledge,
which
Thus, as Paul says, "Now we see dimly, as in a mirror,
but then we shall see clearly, face to fdace."
>Hi elconscious
>
>a.) I believe that there is only one (1) active mind (Cosmic) Mind,
>but (2) each of us, as monads have no windows tio see out,
>however are contually and instantly update
The secret of perception. Particular minds and how they relate to the overall
or Cosmic Mind
The problem of perception in materialistic thinking is that it forces us to
think that there is a homunculo us
Leibniz has a more complicated understanding of particular minds and how they
relate to Cos
On 31 May 2013, at 19:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/31/2013 10:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2013, at 01:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/30/2013 3:43 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:04:13PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
You mean unprovable? I get confused because it seems tha
On 31 May 2013, at 19:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/31/2013 8:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2013, at 21:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/30/2013 2:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 20:12, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/29/2013 12:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I don't see the analogy. I do
6 matches
Mail list logo
