On 6/17/2013 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Most are just dualist. They are indeed easily shown inconsistent. But the problem is
not the absence of mind, it is the believe in a primary physical reality, which
On 17 Jun 2013, at 04:39, Jason Resch wrote:
One question that comes to my mind is how computationalism might
lead to the phenomenon of interference. How is it that infinite
programs going through a state can interfere?
Might interference be something local to the geography of this
part
On 17 Jun 2013, at 01:30, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
snip
That people can initiate law is nice, though.
I would like to initiate the prohibition of prohibition. Oops :)
:-)
What is freedom of speech without freedom of thought? When w
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:31, Roger Clough wrote:
Consciousness in the Materialist, Computationalist and Leibniz models
This image of a man looking out a window represents the Subject/
Object distinction.
The man represents the subject, which is subjective or inside.
Outside of the window is
Hi
Since there has been some question from materialists about my use of the phrase
"beyond spacetime",
I thought I would show that this is a perfectly legitimate concept now being
investigated
by the likes of Roger Penrose and Lee Smolin.
Here is a 2011 article discussing phase space, which is
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Jun 2013, at 21:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/15/2013 12:40 AM, chris peck wrote:
Hi Rog
As you have described them a materialist could not be a
"combination of both" rationalism and empiricism, beca
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Most are just dualist. They are indeed easily shown inconsistent.
But the problem is not the absence of mind, it is the believe in a
primary physical reality, which is not sustained by any evidences.
??
7 matches
Mail list logo