FW: Journal. Womenio.com Paganism & Tattoos

From: Philip Benjamin : general_the...@googlegroups.com Subject: Journal. Womenio.com Paganism & Tattoos [Philip Benjamin] Read below in article by Sylvia Silverstone in Journal. Womenio.com . Contrasts

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:39 PM wrote: > The authors are professionals. You hold that your knowledge base is is > greater than the authors? > First of all it's author, not authors, it's written by only one guy, of course you wouldn't know that since you didn't read it, you just posted a link to

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:49 AM smitra wrote: > > > *> The way one would be able to see that the system despite > performingextremely well does not have the intellectual capabilities of a > humanbeing, would be to follow up on gaps in its knowledge and see if it > canlearn from its mistakes and

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

You are not engaging with what I am actually saying. Telmo Am Sa, 18. Mär 2023, um 13:29, schrieb John Clark: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 5:28 AM Telmo Menezes wrote: > >> *> Huge progresses is being made, but we are not at the human level of >> generality of intelligence and autonomy. Not even

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 5:28 AM Telmo Menezes wrote: *> Huge progresses is being made, but we are not at the human level of > generality of intelligence and autonomy. Not even close.* > Not even close? Don't be silly. *> I fear that you are falling for the very human bias (I fall for it so >

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

Am Sa, 18. Mär 2023, um 08:49, schrieb smitra: > So, in the video we see that it got a question wrong because it thought > that 33 is a prime number. I would be more impressed by a system that > may make many more mistakes like that than this GPT system made, but > where there is a follow-up

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

Am Fr, 17. Mär 2023, um 14:11, schrieb John Clark: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 8:26 AM Telmo Menezes wrote: > __ > >> *> Well, this is Machine Learning 101. If you train a model, it will always >> perform better* > > Well yes, if a machine couldn't learn then it wouldn't be intelligent! Ok

Re: 4 Tests Reveal Bing (GPT 4) ≈ 114 IQ (last test is nuts)

I'll be convinced if they succeed making such a system do original research in, say, theoretical physics or mathematics and get lots of high quality research results published that gets los of citations for groundbreaking work, rather than small improvements of details of existing work. If the