> I think this is wrongheaded. You doubt that you really assume "things are
> how they appear to me" - the Earth appears flat, wood appears solid, and
> electrons don't appear at all. What one does is build, or learn, a model
> that fits the world and comports with "how they appear". I see no
Nick: the "practical" - "philosopher".
I refer to my 'misunderstood' expression to Bruno:
"NAME Calling"
(which was a pun, meaning we "call" names and assign
meaning to it - in our OWN mindset, then fight for
THIS meaning against another person's meaning "called"
by the same NAME) - Bruno misu
Nick Prince wrote:
> This is a form of solipsism - it is difficult to attack it and
> defending it can be similarly time consuming. I think we have to move
> on and believe there is a better approach – if only to get somewhere
> other than back to the beginning every time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
This is a form of solipsism - it is
difficult to attack it and defending it can be similarly time consuming. I
think we have to move on and believe there is a better approach – if only to
get somewhere other than back to the beginning every time.
- Original Messag
4 matches
Mail list logo
