Re: Faster than light communication

experiment (not undertaken yet and that involves some kind of quantum erasement using polarisation filters) that would prove faster than light communication. I've searched the net. He seems not to be a nut. He denies that the Copenhagen Interpretation is the correct one for describin realit

Re: Faster than light communication

undertaken yet and that involves some kind of quantum erasement using > polarisation filters) that would prove faster than light > communication. > > I've searched the net. He seems not to be a nut. He denies that the > Copenhagen Interpretation is the correct one for describin

Faster than light communication

filters) that would prove faster than light communication. I've searched the net. He seems not to be a nut. He denies that the Copenhagen Interpretation is the correct one for describin reality and he supports zero-worlds interpretation (quantum information theory, we're all entangled qbi