On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Craig Weinberg
whatsons...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
The universe is algorithmic insofar as a small number of physical rules
gives rise to everything that we see around us.
Only if we infer that is the case. Physical rules don't give rise to
anything,
The quote might be wrong, as you answer statements which are not mine.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 15:49, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or
OK, This post is clearer. forget my early reply.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 15:55, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/11 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
zombie-actors that try to
2012/10/11 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the
On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is
made of
zombie-actors that try to
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Comp seems to avoid this insurmountable problem by avoiding the issue of
whether the computer actually had an experience, only that it appeared to
have an experience. So comp's requirement is as if rather than is.
In
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have an harcoded belief in
the
Hi Alberto G. Corona and Bruno,
Perhaps I can express the problem of solipsism as this.
To have a mind means that one can experience.
Experiences are subjective and thus cannot be actually shared,
the best one can do is share a description of the experience.
If one cannot actually share
That is true. To pressupose an experience of self in others is a leap
on faith based on similarity. It is duck philosophy. What seems a
Duck, must be a Duck. Even Hume had to limit its destructive
philosophy to avoid self destructiveness. Because there are core
beliefs that we don´t doubt, or
On 09 Oct 2012, at 11:50, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Alberto G. Corona and Bruno,
Perhaps I can express the problem of solipsism as this.
To have a mind means that one can experience.
Hmm... Not really, with my terminology. A mind is not enough for an
experience. You need a soul. It is a
On 09 Oct 2012, at 13:29, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
But still after this reasoning, I doubt that the self conscious
philosopher robot have the kind of thing, call it a soul, that I have.
?
You mean it is a zombie?
I can't conceive consciousness without a soul. Even if only the
universal
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have an harcoded belief in
the conventional thing. Maybe it is, because otherwise, I will act
in strange and self destructive ways. I would
13 matches
Mail list logo
