Eh You asked me to explain my position better. If you say that you already
knew that, That is fantastic.
My answer is against the ones that think that something is better than
something other based on some simple factors. And use it to discard as
flawed the process that consider all the factors
To whom was this a reply?
Brent
On 3/19/2015 11:55 AM, LizR wrote:
As far as I know evolutionary advantage means favouring the replication of a specific
trait (or the genes underlying it) over competing traits. The simplistic reasoning of
an ignorant is the reasoning of Charles Darwin and
good or bad for what circunstances and for what unit of evolution in what
amount of time? . If I say sexual reproduction is bad, because, mitosis is
a delicate process that may fail and produce many problems. cloning is
better because it is simpler. therefore natural selection do it wrong
As far as I know evolutionary advantage means favouring the replication
of a specific trait (or the genes underlying it) over competing traits. The
simplistic reasoning of an ignorant is the reasoning of Charles Darwin
and Richard Dawkins - that evolution acts on the individual in the first
case,
LizR:
My descendants can not develop wings living in mountains, even if wings
permit us to move faster, this does not mean that natural selection do it
wrong. Even if there are animals that fly. My descendants will not develop
wings because my other traits forces to solve the problem of
, Mar 19, 2015 12:24 pm
Subject: Re: Looks like this isn't a spandrell after all
By the way number 2: The theory of evolution is the most biased name for
natural selection. Theory of tradition would have been a better name by far.
Since practically 100% of the traits are inherited from
On 20 March 2015 at 09:21, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
LizR:
My descendants can not develop wings living in mountains, even if wings
permit us to move faster, this does not mean that natural selection do it
wrong. Even if there are animals that fly. My descendants will not
By the way number 2: The theory of evolution is the most biased name for
natural selection. Theory of tradition would have been a better name by
far. Since practically 100% of the traits are inherited from generation to
generation
Theory of evolution is not only biased, but ideologically biased
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:08:05PM +1300, LizR wrote:
Damn it, I've often cited this as an example of unintelligent design and
now the creationists get the last laugh. Oh well that's science!
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-purpose-of-our-eyes-strange-wiring-is-unveiled
The
Damn it, I've often cited this as an example of unintelligent design and
now the creationists get the last laugh. Oh well that's science!
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-purpose-of-our-eyes-strange-wiring-is-unveiled
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Yeah, I wondered about noctural animals. Also, they say: This is a
long-standing puzzle, even more so since the same structure, of neurons
before light detectors, exists in all vertebrates, showing evolutionary
stability.
Which also strikes me as suspect since it could just be not worth
correcting
On 3/18/2015 5:08 PM, LizR wrote:
Damn it, I've often cited this as an example of unintelligent design and now the
creationists get the last laugh. Oh well that's science!
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-purpose-of-our-eyes-strange-wiring-is-unveiled
I don't think you need to
12 matches
Mail list logo
