Saibal Mitra wrote:
Bruno wrote:
At 16:25 +0200 11/10/1996, Saibal Mitra wrote:
You can still have realism, but it must be the case that at least some
of
the things we think of as ``real physical objects´´ like e.g. electrons
are
not real.
What would that mean? What would be real? Even in my
Gordon wrote:
But you have an inconsistent idea in that on the one hand a theory which
say that they are physical object that becoame no physical and then just
comp pure comp.Now although I dont thing it that narrow just like the
old Clock work view, I do think that your theory can be simpler in
Onderwerp: Re: Many Fermis Interpretation Paradox -- So why aren't they
here?
If Gerard 't Hooft's deterministic account of Quantum field
is both realist and Lorentz invariant, it would contradict Bell's theorem
or Kochen and Specker theorem, or GHZ (Greenberger, Horn, Zeilinger
Saibal Mitra wrote:
Suppose you are a virtual person, programmed by me and living in a virtual
environment. You do some experiments to find the laws of physics. You try to
break up things and look what they are ``made of´´. Would you ever discover
how the pentium processor works if you
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 4 oktober 2002 18:13
Onderwerp: Re: Many Fermis Interpretation Paradox -- So why aren't they
here?
At 9:36 -0700 1/10/2002, Tim May wrote:
MWI looks
At 9:36 -0700 1/10/2002, Tim May wrote:
MWI looks, then, like just another variant of modal realism. To
wit, there IS a universe in which unicorns exist, and another in
which Germany won the Second World War, but these universes are
forever and completely out of touch with us.
Not quite due
At 12:26 -0700 30/09/2002, Tim May wrote:
If the alternate universes implied by the mainstream MWI (as opposed
to variants like consistent histories) are actual in some sense,
with even the slightest chance of communication between universes,
then why have we not seen solid evidence of such
On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, at 06:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
At 12:26 -0700 30/09/2002, Tim May wrote:
If the alternate universes implied by the mainstream MWI (as opposed
to variants like consistent histories) are actual in some sense,
with even the slightest chance of communication
If the alternate universes implied by the mainstream MWI (as opposed to
variants like consistent histories) are actual in some sense, with
even the slightest chance of communication between universes, then why
have we not seen solid evidence of such communication?
Amongst the universes, many
It could just mean that communication between the universes is
impossible. Which is not surprising, really, as the division between
universes in the MWI is what allows conscious thought to exist.
It is perhaps of more interest to other multi-universe scenarios that
are independent of the
So Deutsch feels that if such a computer is built, the case for many worlds will be compelling." -Bob Strasser - Original Message - From: Russell Standish Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Many Fermis Interpretation P
11 matches
Mail list logo
