From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:06 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:06 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
--
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
You did not read the study I
From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
You did not read the study I posted did you?
No, and I'm quite certain you didn't either,
The epidemiological evidence linking exposure to Radon to increased risk
of cancer is
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Then why have IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)
studies linked exposure to Radon gas to increased lung cancer (as well as
Leukemia) rates?
As I said nobody doubts
From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
All of these studies reference externally received radiation
No they do not. The primary source of natural background radiation is Radon
gas and people breathe it. Radon is
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
IIUC, the occupational acceptable limits are based on studies of
survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (who actually received a range of
different exposures, depending on how screened they were at the time of
the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 10:41 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 10:46 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Russell Standish li
All of these studies reference externally received radiation and do not address
the very different situation of radionuclides becoming incorporated or lodged
into living tissue. What is the long term effect of a radionuclide – radiating
the same cluster of cells immediately adjacent to it in
My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than what
is considered normal doses of radiation actually have improved tolerance
and get less cancers etc, though I can't recall where I saw/read/heard it.
But that obviously doesn't include if any of the stuff gets into your body.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 11:49:08AM +1200, LizR wrote:
My 2cI seem to recall hearing that people exposed to higher than what
is considered normal doses of radiation actually have improved tolerance
and get less cancers etc, though I can't recall where I saw/read/heard it.
But that
I have a feeling that the idea of no safe dosage of radiation was
popularised in Rosalie Bertell's No Immediate Danger which I seem to
remember was a big seller at the time (mid 80s).
http://www.amazon.com/No-Immediate-Danger-Prognosis-Radioactive/dp/0913990256
--
You received this message
15 matches
Mail list logo
