On 13 Sep 2012, at 13:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
SNIP
BRUNO: I mainly agree [that there are two types of truth, one ruling
the objective world, the other, being subjective, ruling the
subjective world]. But then why coming with factual assertion, about
a Jesus guy. I can
Hi Bruno Marchal
SNIP
BRUNO: I mainly agree [that there are two types of truth, one ruling the
objective world, the other, being subjective, ruling the subjective world]. But
then why coming with factual assertion, about a Jesus guy. I can accept the
parabolas,
but I can't take a
content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-12, 15:17:08
Subject: Re: Why we debate religion: two completely different types of truth.
May not be of interest,
but the Reform branch on Judaism has a prayer for Doubt in their
High Holiday services.
That may
Hi Richard,
Judaism, but also taoism have a tradition to consider texts has
deserving comments, and sequence of comments. That is nice indeed, and
make the approach closer to the scientific approach.
But I talk about ideal science, as science can have pope and argument
per authority too,
May not be of interest,
but the Reform branch on Judaism has a prayer for Doubt in their
High Holiday services.
That may be one reason why some have become such good scientists.
Richard
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Sep 2012, at 13:50, Roger
Why we debate religion: two completely different and frequently
confused types of truth.
There are two completely different types of truth.
The first is rational or objective or public truth, discussed
in philosophies of truth and logic.
The second is truth known only privately or
6 matches
Mail list logo
