Le 06-févr.-07, à 03:06, Russell Standish a écrit :
The informatic destructive effects are due to conflicting
information reducing the total amount of information.
Perhaps you could expand?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Le 07-févr.-07, à 02:45, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
Given an uncountably infinite number of objects generated from a
countably infinite list of properties and an uncountably infinite
number of UD's in the metaphor I can not see an issue with this re my
model. As I said above Our World can be
Le 07-févr.-07, à 17:34, Mark Peaty a écrit :
Bruno: 'Dont hesitate to ask why, I am sure few people have
understand the whole point. Some are close to it, perhaps by having
figure this out by themselves.'
MP: Don't look at me boss ... I'm just glad I don't have to
understand 'it' to
Le 07-févr.-07, à 18:06, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
Mark Peaty skrev: And next: what do you mean by 'exist'?
Our Universe is a mathemathical possibility. That is why our
Universe exists. Every mathematically possible Universe exists in the
same way. But we can not get in touch with
Le 08-févr.-07, à 00:10, John M a écrit :
Mark:
fascinating. I like to ask such stupid questions myself.
On my question 'what is consciousness' the best answer I got was:
everybody knows it from a prof-fessional.
(Yes, but everybody knows it differently).
Existence??? I wonder how
Le 08-févr.-07, à 23:42, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
John,
I agree: being open-minded is more important than being right.
OK, but being open-minded would be meaningless if the notion of being
right was meaningless. Being open-minded means being open to the idea
that someone else
Jason,
the site is great, maybe greater than I can realize today.
I, as a practical computer illiterate, (never learned any computerese courses,
not even from books) sat before it with awe, - admiring that it works!
I might have missed it when I tried: I did not find a place to look up topics
On Feb 9, 7:59 am, John M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason,
the site is great, maybe greater than I can realize today.
I, as a practical computer illiterate, (never learned any computerese
courses, not even from books) sat before it with awe, - admiring that it
works!
I might have missed
Jason,
just about the technicalities: I tried the main page with 2-3 topics and the
result was no such title. Categories I did not venture into, because to
find the right wording/spelling requires familiarity in our lingo and I had
in mind to educate the innocent(ignorant) by passers outside
Bruno, I 'may' come back to your (appreciated) remarks, to the last 'why' I
respond:
Because I feel my head in all these ideas - back-and-forth - like looking
at a busy beehive and trying to follow ONE particular bee in it.
John
On 2/9/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le
John M mentioned in a recent post that many on the Everything List may
have conflicting or poor understandings of all the various terminology
used on the list. Hal Ruhl brought up the fact that someone had
previously tried to maintain an acronym list and FAQ for the
Everything List. I thought
11 matches
Mail list logo
