Re: assumptions

[Bruno Marchal]

Le 21-févr.-08, à 15:01, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :

 Oh, I am very much proEverett and proDeutsch and, I might add 
 proStandish
 (having translated his book Theory of Nothing into swedish). And you 
 are
 right of course, it was your assumptions I questioned...


OK, and I said : No problem then, because (as a logician perhaps) I 
seldomly discuss assumptions.

But still, although I agree with Mirek that comp (as I define it, i.e. 
CT + yes doctor) is a very strong hypothesis, the negation of it is 
also quite strong, if not stronger. For believing in non-comp, you have 
to believe in actual physical infinities and/or in genuine third person 
indeterminacy (like copenhagen and anti-everettist). You could perhaps 
elaborate abit, if you have the time.


Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: UDA paper

[Wei Dai]

Bruno Marchal wrote:
 If Wei Dai agree, I could send it online: it is a 1,5 Mega QuickTime
 document attachment. I guess it is a bit too big. Some day I will put
 them on my web page. It does illustrate some points. The problem is
 that my all complex plane software does no more run on current
 computers.

Bruno, you can upload it to 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/files. 



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---