On 16 Jan 2011, at 22:27, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thanks for the answer. My question was due to the fact that comp
presumably can simulate more than we observe. Let me check if I have
understood your answer correctly. I will cite a paragraph from my text
On 16 Jan 2011, at 22:37, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno and Evgenii,
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 11:50 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: comp and Maxwell demon
You can simulate it. But you cannot program it. It uses a
On Jan 12, 10:50 pm, Colin Hales c.ha...@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
I confess to the usual level of exasperation. Yet again the great
culturally maintained mental block subverts real progress. And, yet
again, the participant doesn;t even know they are doing it. Garrett
says
/The key
on 17.01.2011 14:00 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 16 Jan 2011, at 22:27, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Have you meant that the Universal Dovetailer will act for such a
situation according to Poincaré recurrence?
The UD will do that an infinity of times, given that the Poincaré
4 matches
Mail list logo