On Dec 22 2011, 12:18 pm, alexalex alexmka...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello, Everythinglisters!
The below text is a philosophical essay on what qualia may represent.
I doubt you'll manage to finish reading it (it's kind of long, and
translated from anoter language), but if you do I'll be happy to
On 09 Jan 2012, at 06:56, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
But naturalism want to explain things by reducing it to nature or
natural law,
If you want to explain X you say that X exists because of Y. It's
true that Y can be
On Jan 9, 6:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with your general reply to Craig, but I disagree that
computations are physical. That's the revisionist conception of
computation, defended by Deustch, Landauer, etc. Computations have
been discovered by mathematicians when
On 09 Jan 2012, at 14:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with your general reply to Craig, but I disagree that
computations are physical. That's the revisionist conception of
computation, defended by Deustch, Landauer, etc.
On Jan 9, 12:00 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2012, at 14:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with your general reply to Craig, but I disagree that
computations are physical. That's the revisionist conception
On 1/9/2012 19:54, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 9, 12:00 pm, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2012, at 14:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:06 am, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with your general reply to Craig, but I disagree that
computations are
On Jan 9, 12:56 am, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
But naturalism want to explain things by reducing it to nature or natural
law,
If you want to explain X you say that X exists because of Y. It's true that
Y can
For Stephen and anyone else interested, I asked the following to Steve Grand
regarding the capacity of his Grandroids to do self-modeling:
Quick question (and forgive me if this has already come up) - do you think
the grandroids will have the capacity for self-modeling? If so, is there
Thanks Terren!
Good stuff!
Onward!
Stephen
On 1/9/2012 2:40 PM, terren wrote:
For Stephen and anyone else interested, I asked the following to Steve Grand
regarding the capacity of his Grandroids to do self-modeling:
Quick question (and forgive me if this has already come up) - do you
Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
No free will = no hunger. No need for it. No mechanism for it. No logic to
it.
Cannot comment, don't know what ASCII sequence free will means.
That was my point. Knowing how to eat does not require logic or induction.
But your question was Is it
10 matches
Mail list logo
