On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Most are just dualist. They are indeed easily shown inconsistent.
But the problem is not the absence of mind, it is the believe in a
primary physical reality, which is not sustained by any evidences.
??
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Jun 2013, at 21:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/15/2013 12:40 AM, chris peck wrote:
Hi Rog
As you have described them a materialist could not be a
combination of both rationalism and empiricism,
Hi
Since there has been some question from materialists about my use of the phrase
beyond spacetime,
I thought I would show that this is a perfectly legitimate concept now being
investigated
by the likes of Roger Penrose and Lee Smolin.
Here is a 2011 article discussing phase space, which is
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:31, Roger Clough wrote:
Consciousness in the Materialist, Computationalist and Leibniz models
This image of a man looking out a window represents the Subject/
Object distinction.
public domain 6_.jpg
The man represents the subject, which is subjective or inside.
On 17 Jun 2013, at 01:30, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
snip
That people can initiate law is nice, though.
I would like to initiate the prohibition of prohibition. Oops :)
:-)
What is freedom of speech without freedom
On 17 Jun 2013, at 04:39, Jason Resch wrote:
One question that comes to my mind is how computationalism might
lead to the phenomenon of interference. How is it that infinite
programs going through a state can interfere?
Might interference be something local to the geography of this
On 6/17/2013 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jun 2013, at 19:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/16/2013 12:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Most are just dualist. They are indeed easily shown inconsistent. But the problem is
not the absence of mind, it is the believe in a primary physical reality,
7 matches
Mail list logo
