I'm not happy with an article that deliberately picks on the use of
favourite to make a spurious argument. It's obvious what was meant -
would preferred have been better, or considered most likely ? That sort
of intellectual dishonesty isn't a good start.
Then the phrase in the title - why are
Brent,
What's your position on the MWI?
Best,
Telmo.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:36 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Forwarded Message
In July 2011, participants at a conference on the placid shore of Lake
Traunsee in Austria were polled on what they thought the
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Forwarded Message
In July 2011, participants at a conference on the placid shore of Lake
Traunsee in Austria were polled on what they thought the meeting was about.
You might imagine that this question
Well contrary to his title... he doesn't ask a question but assert it is a
fantasy... and he just uses an argument of disbelief... well ok, but that's
not an argument... he also talks about splitting with universes created at
every interaction, everywhere, without entertaining the differentiation
I think it's taking the mathematics too seriously (but then I'm not a Platonist). When QM
is integrated with GR something different may emerge.
Brent
On 2/19/2015 2:19 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Brent,
What's your position on the MWI?
Best,
Telmo.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:36 PM, meekerdb
On 2/19/2015 5:34 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:59 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/19/2015 3:52 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think it's taking the mathematics too seriously (but then I'm not a
Platonist). When QM is integrated with GR something different may emerge.
So which interpretation do you prefer? Presumably one that takes the math
less
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:59 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/19/2015 3:52 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think it's taking the mathematics too seriously (but then I'm not a
Platonist). When QM is integrated
On 2/19/2015 3:52 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think it's taking the mathematics too seriously (but then I'm not a Platonist).
When QM is integrated with GR something different may emerge.
So
9 matches
Mail list logo
