Brent:
>That depends on what you mean by "God". As I've pointed out at length,
>language is defined by usage and usage says that "God" means an immortal
>person with supernatural power who wants, and deserves, to be
>worshipped. You want to hijack the word and justify it by referring to
>a
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:28:17PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 12 Dec 2016, at 19:31, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 12/12/2016 3:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>
> >>>it's just like seeing the storm as anger of the sky-god.
> >>>People experience anger, so they think they have
On 12/13/2016 3:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Dec 2016, at 19:36, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 12/12/2016 3:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
And the religionist, trying to keep their comfort and influence,
keep fuzzing up the target and spreading it out because it's center
keeps getting hit by
On 12 Dec 2016, at 19:36, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 12/12/2016 3:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
And the religionist, trying to keep their comfort and influence,
keep fuzzing up the target and spreading it out because it's
center keeps getting hit by facts.
Atheism is either agnostic, or is a
On 12 Dec 2016, at 19:31, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 12/12/2016 3:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
it's just like seeing the storm as anger of the sky-god. People
experience anger, so they think they have understood the storm.
They don't understand fluid dynamics (at least until very
5 matches
Mail list logo
