Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:52:32 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM, > wrote: > > *​> ​It was on hyper sensitizing photographic emulsions, maybe in 1967, >> and probably a second one same year. AG* >> >> One of the co-authors;

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 3:37:41 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 9:18:12 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM, wrote: >> >> *​> ​You and other skeptics should be demanding release of material

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:23:23 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 3:37:41 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 9:18:12 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM,

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:43:34 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 3:40:52 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:52:32 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM,

Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 9:18:12 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM, > wrote: > > *​> ​You and other skeptics should be demanding release of material from >> which Project Mogul balloons were made,* >> > > ​We already know what

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 3:40:52 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:52:32 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM, wrote: >> >> *​> ​It was on hyper sensitizing photographic emulsions, maybe in

Re: INDEXICAL Computationalism

> On 1 Mar 2018, at 00:19, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 2/28/2018 7:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 26 Feb 2018, at 19:09, Brent Meeker >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2/26/2018 2:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

Re: Can work be extracted from the expansion of the universe?

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:37:35 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > I don't think it's wrong in principle, but in practice the expansion force > is like negative gravity whose force is very weak and whose speed even over > galactic distances in very small so the available power density is

Re: Singularity -- when AI exceeds human intelligence

> On 28 Feb 2018, at 20:38, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 2:08:43 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 26 Feb 2018, at 18:02, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote: >> >> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at

Godel with GR and QM

I am shifting this over to a new topic. On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 4:53:04 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Feb 2018, at 20:38, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 2:08:43 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 26 Feb

Re: Can work be extracted from the expansion of the universe?

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: *> This energy could be extracted if you could put tethers between > galaxies.* *I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks so. * > *> The energy density of the vacuum that propels this accelerated

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:57 AM, wrote: *​> ​Here they are:* > > > *"Hypersens**itization of Infrared-sensitive Photographic Emulsions", The > Astronomical Journal , 73, (1968) 518-21.* > *​Carl Sagan did not write that paper.​ * > ​> ​ > *"A Statistical Analysis of

Re: Can work be extracted from the expansion of the universe?

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 11:45:04 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Lawrence Crowell < > goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com > wrote: > > *> This energy could be extracted if you could put tethers between >> galaxies.* > > *I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who

Re: INDEXICAL Computationalism

On 3/1/2018 2:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 1 Mar 2018, at 00:19, Brent Meeker > wrote: On 2/28/2018 7:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Feb 2018, at 19:09, Brent Meeker > wrote:

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 1:16:15 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:57 AM, wrote: > > *​> ​Here they are:* >> >> >> *"Hypersens**itization of Infrared-sensitive Photographic Emulsions", >> The Astronomical Journal , 73, (1968) 518-21.* >> > >

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 10:27:59 PM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 1:29:38 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:18:12 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM,

Re: Disclosure Project

On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 1:29:38 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:18:12 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM, wrote: >> >> *​> ​You and other skeptics should be demanding release of material from

Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:18:12 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:25 PM, > wrote: > > *​> ​You and other skeptics should be demanding release of material from >> which Project Mogul balloons were made,* >> > > ​We already know what they