I was disappointed in the thin, banal issue of SciAm on "Time," but now
there's a new special issue devoted to "The Once and Future Cosmos."
It's very good, filled with excellent illustrations of models of
cosmology, key experiments, and what we currently know about the
structure of the cosmo
Dear Wei,
It seems to me that there is no need for a "relativistic" version of QM
for the simple reason that the wave function is not taken to be a field over
space-time. It exist in Hilbert space not in spacetime. One could even argue
somewhat coherently that "spacetime" is derived from the
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 10:03 AM, Wei Dai wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> This comes from the fact that MWI is explained most of the time
>> in the context of non relativistic QM (which assumes time and space).
>> But this problem disappear o
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> This comes from the fact that MWI is explained most of the time
> in the context of non relativistic QM (which assumes time and space).
> But this problem disappear once you take into account the
> space time structure of relativisti
Hi all,
On George Levy's thought experiment.
-cf: http://www.escribe.com/science/theory/m3991.html
It is a pleasure of living a nice little star trek episode :) It could
perhaps, in some yet to develop approach, help to figure out where
quantum like complementarities arise. It cannot be use
5 matches
Mail list logo
