Re: Let There Be Something

2005-11-07 Thread Russell Standish
I don't agree that your original query was left unanswered - it was answered by several people, in possibly contradictory ways (that remains to be seen - I tend to see the commonality). Perhaps you mean the answers were unsatisfactory for you, in which case I'd be interested in hearing from you why

Re: Let There Be Something

2005-11-07 Thread Quentin Anciaux
Hi Jesse, I think the point is that arithmetical realism is a faith. That every number has a successor is an axiom, thus considered as true. But while I believe in arithmetical realism I can conceive that other people don't and see arithmetical realism/plantonism has not true/real... that someh

Re: Let There Be Something

2005-11-07 Thread Jesse Mazer
Tom wrote: Perhaps there needs to be a new thread for the new topic (Game of Life, etc.). It seems my original inquiry has been left unanswered, but this is my point. My challenge was that multiverse theory is just pulling things out of thin air just as much as any other metaphysical theor

Re: Let There Be Something

2005-11-07 Thread daddycaylor
Perhaps there needs to be a new thread for the new topic (Game of Life, etc.). It seems my original inquiry has been left unanswered, but this is my point. My challenge was that multiverse theory is just pulling things out of thin air just as much as any other metaphysical theory. At each po

Question for Bruno

2005-11-07 Thread uv
Bruno said on FOR List(Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality (was Re: Quantum Suicide) > That necessity is implied itself by the incompleteness phenomena, > but that is technical (ask me on the everything-list if interested). Ok I am interested. Also (separate query) - How does your approach tie in wi