Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-11 Thread Brent Meeker
Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > On 12/09/2007, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> OK. So where are the flying pigs? > > Elsewhere. Existence is not a property, but position is. Ok. Why are they there and not here? I'm sure that Stathis takes my point that saying everything-exists is n

Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-11 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On 12/09/2007, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. So where are the flying pigs? Elsewhere. Existence is not a property, but position is. -- Stathis Papaioannou --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-11 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On 12/09/2007, Youness Ayaita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The no-justification argues that it doesn't make sense to introduce > 'existence' as a property, or expressed in another way, that it is not > possible to meaningfully separate (imaginable) things that have the > (hypothetic) property tha

Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-11 Thread Brent Meeker
Youness Ayaita wrote: ... > 3 No-justification > > The no-justification is the most satisfying justification for the > Everything ensemble I know. I even think that a more satisfying > justification is impossible in principle. So what is it about? The > crucial point is to try to get to the bott

No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-11 Thread Youness Ayaita
No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble Youness Ayaita In this message, I present my "no-justification" of the hypothesis that everything exists. The no-justification argues that no justification at all is needed to accept the hypothesis. This provides a new and very satisfying app

Re: Rép : Observer Moment = Sigma1-Sentences

2007-09-11 Thread John Mikes
Bruno, you ARE a teacher (a good and passionate one) but your imagination is insufficient. You cannot imagine how much I don't know. pick up 'words' and 'phrases' and apply common sense to them with a certain authoritative flair, so those who understand the topic can think that I am talking sense

Re: Rép : Observer Moment = Sigma1-Sentences

2007-09-11 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 10-sept.-07, à 21:03, John Mikes a écrit : > Dear Bruno, i failed to acknowledge your kind reply - and others > joining in - for the past month, not because I have been tied up with > 'other' WEB lists, but because I realized that i have nothing to say > "in kind" of the language you use.