arXiv.org/abs/0909.1508
I saw the title and thought of what Bruno would make of it. Any
thoughts?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to
Ronald.
I pursue (vaguely) such development and - though have no intention to
outguess Bruno's opinion - find it a VERY PRACTICAL (may I call it: e-bio)
line. (lineS - plural). Quite amazing results have been so far achieved in
this IMO totally initial phase. I can't wait how the
2009/9/9 Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com:
What you say above seems pretty much in sympathy with the reductio
arguments based on arbitrariness of implementation.
It is strictly an argument against the claim that
computation causes consciousness , as opposed
to the claim that mental states
I have to agree that I am curious what responses I will get from the
frequent posters.
I see this as someday being able to say,yes, Doctor.
Ronald
On Sep 10, 9:17 am, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Ronald.
I pursue (vaguely) such development and -
ronaldheld wrote:
arXiv.org/abs/0909.1508
I saw the title and thought of what Bruno would make of it. Any
thoughts?
The authors write, However, recent studies lead to the conclusion that
the human mind is not a classical computer, and, in general, not
completely reducible to any kind of
David Nyman wrote:
2009/9/9 Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com:
What you say above seems pretty much in sympathy with the reductio
arguments based on arbitrariness of implementation.
It is strictly an argument against the claim that
computation causes consciousness , as opposed
On 10 Sep 2009, at 19:38, Brent Meeker wrote:
ronaldheld wrote:
arXiv.org/abs/0909.1508
I saw the title and thought of what Bruno would make of it. Any
thoughts?
The authors write, However, recent studies lead to the conclusion
that
the human mind is not a classical computer, and, in
David Nyman wrote:
2009/9/10 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
Yes, I agree. But if we're after a physical theory, we also want to
be able to give in either case a clear physical account of their
apprehensiveness, which would include a physical justification of why
the fine-grained
I thought that I would start a thread to consolidate some of the books
useful in following current and old threads. if people alos want to
post key papers here, I do not see a problem with that.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
2009/9/10 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
But isn't that because the computational in CTM is abstracted away
from a context in which there is action and purpose. It's the same
problem that leads to the question, Does a rock compute every
function? When looking at a physical process
10 matches
Mail list logo
