On 3/5/2011 4:04 PM, Pzomby wrote:
On Mar 5, 1:50 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/5/2011 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Mar 2011, at 19:41, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/4/2011 6:13 AM, 1Z wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:57 am, Bruno Marchalwrote:
On Mar 5, 1:50 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 3/5/2011 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On 04 Mar 2011, at 19:41, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> >> On 3/4/2011 6:13 AM, 1Z wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 4, 7:57 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> >>>
> > If you still don't see this, ask for clari
On 3/5/2011 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Mar 2011, at 19:41, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/4/2011 6:13 AM, 1Z wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:57 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> If you still don't see this, ask for clarification of the sane04
> paper(*), because it seems to me that the first sev
On 04 Mar 2011, at 01:36, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:48:38AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So I will be franc. The problem of interaction is not solved at all,
even between third person describable objects. And the problem of
how many first person "really" exist is also
On 04 Mar 2011, at 19:41, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/4/2011 6:13 AM, 1Z wrote:
On Mar 4, 7:57 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> If you still don't see this, ask for clarification of the
sane04
> paper(*), because it seems to me that the first seven steps are
rather
> clear, there. You
On 04 Mar 2011, at 20:10, Andrew Soltau wrote:
I remind you that we are in the everything list which is based on
the idea that "everything" is simpler than "something".
If we take Chalmers and Bitbol seriously, consciousness is a
perfectly symmetrical emergent property of the Everything, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
