Re: 1P-causality

Thanks, Brent, - however: I did not restrict myself to physics (lest: 'fundamental') and had a shorthand-typo in my text: - - - (=cause) - - - which indeed means: a change, effected by - what we call: a cause. I was referring to our (conventional) system looking only inside the 'model'

Re: 1P-causality

Hi John, I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you were just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already insisted on the point. I am sorry because it is not completely in the topic: On 07 Apr 2011, at 17:42, John Mikes wrote: Thanks, Brent, -

Re: 1P-causality

Hello, Bruno, and thanks for your reply. I am sorry for an interjected remark-sentence quite out of context in a topic it does not belong at all. Especially since it was mal-chosen and mal-formulated. I enjoyed your teaching about the UM etc., I could use it. I am presently mentally anchored in my

Re: 1P-causality

Hi Bruno, Thus wisdom is a measure of how much one knows that one does not know. Onward! Stephen From: Bruno Marchal Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:48 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 1P-causality Hi John, I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement,

Re: 1P-causality

On 4/7/2011 9:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Hi John, I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you were just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already insisted on the point. I am sorry because it is not completely in the topic: On 07 Apr 2011, at 17:42,