On 29 Apr 2011, at 02:42, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Please allow me to ask another question. Is the notion of an
“observer moment” corresponding to “the smallest possible conscious
experience” related to Bruno’s concept of substitution level? ISTM
that both act like the idea of a coarse
Hi John,
On 28 Apr 2011, at 21:40, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno, allow me to interject some remarks (questions?) indented
and starting (JM):
John
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 28 Apr 2011, at 13:10, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno said, If
On 28 Apr 2011, at 20:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/28/2011 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Apr 2011, at 22:48, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/27/2011 12:16 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Recently I have seen interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms
of quantum decoherence, for example Decoherence
On 4/29/2011 9:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi John,
On 28 Apr 2011, at 21:40, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno, allow me to interject some remarks (questions?) indented
and starting (JM):
John
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:45 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Reading The Theory of Nothing
On 29 Apr 2011, at 02:42, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Please allow me to ask another question. Is the notion of an “observer
moment” corresponding to
try stuart hammeroff and roger penrose collaborationregarding
conciousness.
On Apr 27, 12:16 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
Recently I have seen interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of
quantum decoherence, for example Decoherence and the Transition from
Quantum to
6 matches
Mail list logo
