On 8/28/2011 11:06 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Capillary action is not a violation of the laws of physics. What
about substance monism precludes any life form from existing?
Also are you saying you are a substance dualist?
Hi,
Is 'substance dualism' the only form of dualism? Maybe you migh
On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
On Aug 28, 4:07 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Craig Weinberg
Why do I have to choose between a song not existing or it being some
kind if immaterial phantom in order to explain how one
phenomenological text ca
On Aug 28, 4:07 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > Why do I have to choose between a song not existing or it being some
> > kind if immaterial phantom in order to explain how one
> > phenomenological text can be encoded through the patterns of other
> >
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 28 Aug 2011, at 13:50, benjayk wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Aug 2011, at 23:31, benjayk wrote:
>>>
I won't answer to this post in detail, simply because I find it
unsatisfying
to discuss details that are very easy to
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:07 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
It's not something physical that eludes detection, it's just a
matter
of understanding that a stem cell doesn't have any purpose
On 28 Aug 2011, at 13:50, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Aug 2011, at 23:31, benjayk wrote:
I won't answer to this post in detail, simply because I find it
unsatisfying
to discuss details that are very easy to see for me, yet hardly
communicable.
Honestly, for all intents and
On Aug 28, 5:21 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On 25/08/2011, at 12:37 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > You're giving evolution an active role. Evolution can't program
> > anything. It's the agents themselves which embody characteristics
> > which happen to be selected for. Evolution cannot prog
On Aug 28, 3:07 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
> wrote:
> > It's not something physical that eludes detection, it's just a matter
> > of understanding that a stem cell doesn't have any purpose on a
> > chemical level in developing into different
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 27 Aug 2011, at 23:31, benjayk wrote:
>
>>
>> I won't answer to this post in detail, simply because I find it
>> unsatisfying
>> to discuss details that are very easy to see for me, yet hardly
>> communicable.
>> Honestly, for all intents and purposes I have com
On 27 Aug 2011, at 23:31, benjayk wrote:
I won't answer to this post in detail, simply because I find it
unsatisfying
to discuss details that are very easy to see for me, yet hardly
communicable.
Honestly, for all intents and purposes I have come to the conclusion
that it
is just totally
On 25/08/2011, at 12:37 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> You're giving evolution an active role. Evolution can't program
> anything. It's the agents themselves which embody characteristics
> which happen to be selected for. Evolution cannot program a stone to
> feel pain. How does that answer the
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> It's not something physical that eludes detection, it's just a matter
> of understanding that a stem cell doesn't have any purpose on a
> chemical level in developing into different kinds of tissue in the
> body. It only makes sense from t
12 matches
Mail list logo
