On 3/1/2016 7:29 PM, Dan wrote:
Also- minimization of Fisher information is one shockingly effective
approach to statistic inference of models for complex natural
phenomena (e.g., ones involving multiple evolving interacting agents).
When you don't know the true probability distribution of va
I don't think it has anything to do with Gödel's incompleteness
theorems. Those are about the relation of proofs and consistency.
Minimizing Fisher information is just maximum entropy (minimal
assumption of information) when both means and variances are known. It's
going to give the exact answ
I have some comments on EPI in my book Theory of Nothing, in
connection with how it fits into an ensemble theory everything.
You can download a copy from my website.
EPI is one of those brilliant ideas that must be piece of the puzzle,
yet nobody really quite knows what to make of it. Possibly be
Also- minimization of Fisher information is one shockingly effective
approach to statistic inference of models for complex natural phenomena
(e.g., ones involving multiple evolving interacting agents). When you don't
know the true probability distribution of values for some natural process,
the
"ELUDING THE DEMON – HOW EXTREME PHYSICAL INFORMATION APPLIES. TO SEMIOSIS
AND COMMUNICATION"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBX26OD0dXw
Has this work by Roy Frieden and Vinicius Romanini been reviewed here
already?
Also wanted to share the interview for forthcoming video game "No Man's
Sky"
Bruno, Brent and Dr. Cabessa(?)
The paper is a beautiful scientific work (I used to enjoy the style when
young) and the tw reflections are commendable.
I did not bother to carefully read/follow Dr. Cabessa's paper, it is a
different world from my present mental occupation, browsed through it ad
r
On 01 Mar 2016, at 14:58, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Believe or not, I find your questions easy to answer. This doesn't
mean that I know I am correct, merely, that I am employing Occams
Razor- which is definitively not always true.
I am assuming a physical universe,
So, by th
Believe or not, I find your questions easy to answer. This doesn't mean that I
know I am correct, merely, that I am employing Occams Razor- which is
definitively not always true.
I am assuming a physical universe, at least the portion Earth dwells in.
Computationalism may be its true basis, not
8 matches
Mail list logo
