Re: Strong AI implies MWI

On 5/27/2018 1:22 AM, smitra wrote: This is a physical version of what Bruno has been talking about on this list. With "strong AI" I mean that any simulation of a person generates the mind of that person, and the subjective state of that person is independent of how that simulation is perfo

Re: Entanglement

On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 6:31:43 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 5/26/2018 11:21 PM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: > > > > Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 6.05 Brent Meeker > ha scritto: > > > > On 5/26/2018 1:37 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 5:08:51 AM

Re: Entanglement

On 5/26/2018 11:21 PM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 6.05 Brent Meeker ha scritto: On 5/26/2018 1:37 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 5:08:51 AM UTC, Brent wrote: On 5/25/2018 9:50 PM,

Re: Entanglement

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 8:29:24 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 4:33:27 AM UTC, Bruce wrote: >> >> From: >> >> >> On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 12:06:53 AM UTC, Bruce wrote: >>> >>> From: >> >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 8:16:07 AM UTC, Bruce wrot

Re: Is the Continuum Hypothesis a) really true or really false, or b) something else ?

> On 26 May 2018, at 01:43, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > > I have provided definition of computations, and explicit examples, > > I’m not interested in your definitions, examples are VASTLY more important. > Defi

Re: Entanglement

> Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 8.21 'scerir' via Everything List > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 6.05 Brent Meeker > ha scritto: > > > > > > > > On 5/26/2018 1:37 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com > > mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > >

Strong AI implies MWI

This is a physical version of what Bruno has been talking about on this list. With "strong AI" I mean that any simulation of a person generates the mind of that person, and the subjective state of that person is independent of how that simulation is performed. So, what matters is if certain c

Re: Entanglement

Here is a nice paper-PDF from Hartle on the consistent histories approach to give sense of the relative probabilities on a quantum mechanical history. This is sometimes call the post Everett approach, initiated by Griffith (1984), Omnes, (1988) and discovered also independently by Gell-Man and

Re: Entanglement

> Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 8.37 agrayson2...@gmail.com ha scritto: > > > > On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 6:21:47 AM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Il 27 maggio 2018 alle 6.05 Brent Meeker < > > meek...@verizon.net> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > >