Re: Transporter Paradox

2001-03-19 Thread rwas rwas
--- rwas rwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course we are hard-wired to perceive the passage of time, three-dimensional space, and the pleasure of sex. Physics and Darwin provide explanations of this. What's your explanation?...oh, never mind, I know...It just is. Brent

Re: White Rabbits, Consistency and Dreaming

2001-06-11 Thread rwas rwas
I think the problem is that folks are assuming that the only way you can tell whether you are awake or dreaming is by sensory input limited physical senses, ie., 5 senses. If one pays attention, one can be aware of a number of senses that are not quantified by popular understanding. One of

Re: Introduction (Digital Physics)

2001-06-18 Thread rwas rwas
Hello, --- Joel Dobrzelewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Russell and Brent: I understand this is an extreme position, but I state it this way on purpose: to bring the issue to the foreground and get to the heart of the problem of science today. As long as we insist that continuous

Re: Belief Knowledge

2001-05-06 Thread rwas rwas
You must have a particular problem in mind to have made this comment. I do, a set of problems: 1. Machine cooperation in fabrication robots and other agents that can cooperate in complex tasks such as manufacturing non-robot-friendly components. 2. Synthetic Autonomous Agent

Re: The role of logic, planning ...

2001-05-02 Thread rwas rwas
Just as an example, he says most philosophers would agree that []A-A, where []A is interpreted as knowing A. This is clearly a different meaning of the word to know that we use here in Australia. I get the impression folks here assume that when one person knows something, that only

Re: Belief Knowledge

2001-05-06 Thread rwas rwas
--- Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert W. wrote: [...] Logic is a powerful tool for analysis. Some use it intuitively, you people seem to have mastered formalized, symbolic logic. That's great. Logic is just a branch of mathematics which studies discourse and their

Re: Leibniz Semantics

2001-03-27 Thread rwas rwas
I was'nt aware if was a diadic operator. My boolean interpretation of what's been presented: OR: AB:C 00 0 01 1 10 1 11 1 IF: AB:C 11 1 10 0 01 1 00 1 Can someone explain the IF table? Robert W. --- Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 [EMAIL

Re: (Quantum) suicide not necessary?

2001-03-05 Thread rwas rwas
. It seems to require forming specifics for things lost in the translation to specifics. For me, understanding of AI and consciousness is the kind of thing one interprets, knowing it's only a limited expression. Robert W. --- Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05-Mar-01, rwas rwas wrote: I

Re: need for anthropic reasoning

2001-02-27 Thread rwas rwas
Hello, I'm new in here. I apologize in advance for any inadvertent transgressions... Second, there is no way of knowing whether you are in a so called real world or in a virtual world. So if I don't care about virtual people, I don't even know whether or not I care about myself.

Re: another anthropic reasoning paradox

2001-03-05 Thread rwas rwas
--- rwas rwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had proposed an experiment very similar to a friend some years back concerning identity and consciousness. We start with a machine that can download, upload, and run consciousness. It can also manipulate the functioning of the brain

Re: Transporter Paradox

2001-03-20 Thread rwas rwas
Prove is a strong word. I don't think you can prove that we perceive 3-space... I guess it depends on what you mean by perceive. If I develop software that behaves a certain way in 3-space combining observations, a plan, and then demonstrating an action in that 3-space, I'd say that system

Re: (Quantum) suicide not necessary?

2001-03-05 Thread rwas rwas
--- rwas rwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: versions of many-worlds theories, one might consider a different approach. By deleting certain sectors of one's memory one should be able to travel to different branches of the multiverse. Suppose you are diagnosed