SNIP
ROGER: 2) I can be aware of having experiences that occur in a specific
temporal order only if I perceive
something permanent by reference to which I can determine their
temporal order. (premise)
RUSSELL: What motivates this premise?
ROGER: The permanent entity could be the first
Refutation of (Problematic) Idealism
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:47:12PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/23/2012 2:39 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
2) can be aware of having experiences that occur in a specific temporal
order only if I perceive
something permanent by reference to which I can
Papaioannou
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-23, 17:51:43
Subject: Re: Kant's Refutation of (Problematic) Idealism
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Kant's Refutation of (Problematic) Idealism
Problematic Idealism (Berkeley's idealism, not that of Leibniz
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stathis Papaioannou
OK, but I think you are still left with the I.
I doubted' still means there's an I present.
There's an I present but not necessarily a world to contain it,
which is what Kant set out to prove.
4 matches
Mail list logo
