sistent with
both weak materialism (the belief in Matter) and materialism (the
belief in only Matter).
Bruno
Jesse
On Saturday, November 30, 2013, Roger Clough wrote:
Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
Dennett never tells us what conscilousness is, because
co
scious Mind"?
>
> Jesse
>
> On Saturday, November 30, 2013, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>> Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
>>
>> Dennett never tells us what conscilousness is, because
>> conciouness rwequires a perceiver, and he hasn&#
tween
"information states" and the qualia associated with each one). Have you
read his book "The Conscious Mind"?
Jesse
On Saturday, November 30, 2013, Roger Clough wrote:
> Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
>
> Dennett never tells us what con
On 11/30/2013 8:57 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Steven Pinker, at the end of "How the mind works" present a number of evolutionary and
cognitive explanations of the mind in terms of brain processes . But at the end then
comes the hard question: Why we are conscious and not unconscious robots?.
Roger's arrogance is beyond clueless
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
>
> Dennett never tells us what conscilousness is, because
> conciouness rwequires a perceiver, and he hasn't a c
ted by one Mind at least
2013/11/30 Roger Clough
> Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
>
> Dennett never tells us what conscilousness is, because
> conciouness rwequires a perceiver, and he hasn't a clue as to what that is,
> because that concept
Online opinions of Dennett and Chalmers-- the clueless two
Dennett never tells us what conscilousness is, because
conciouness rwequires a perceiver, and he hasn't a clue as to what that is,
because that concept is foreign to his materialism.
He's clueless. And famous as well maybe be
7 matches
Mail list logo
