Hi Serafino,
At 23:00 +0200 10/07/2002, scerir wrote:
Hal
You can also have a block universe in QM with the many-world
interpretation. It has a more complicated geometric structure but
philosophically it is deterministic, with the same issues regarding
changes, free will, etc.
I'm
One of the criticisms of no-collapse theories has always bothered me.
Some people say that the mystery of non-determinism in conventional
interpretations of QM is replaced by an equally baffling mystery in
no-collapse theories: why do I end up in *this* branch rather than
some other?
The critics
By the term block multiverse I mean a reality in which everything
MUST happen, in some timeline or universe. This sounds a lot like
predestination to me.
Scott W. Somerville, Esq.
The argument that the relativistic space-time named (after H. Weyl) block
universe eliminates the possibility of
Scerir writes:
The argument that the relativistic space-time named (after H. Weyl) block
universe eliminates the possibility of changes, free will, becoming (etc.)
has been used to conclude that between relativity (which demands separability
and determinism) and quamtum mechanics (which
Hal
You can also have a block universe in QM with the many-world
interpretation. It has a more complicated geometric structure but
philosophically it is deterministic, with the same issues regarding
changes, free will, etc.
I'm not an Everettista, anyway let us try. Alice has photon 1,
Scott W. Somerville wrote:
Rodolfo writes, There are no hints of predestination.
By the term block multiverse I mean a reality in which everything
MUST happen, in some timeline or universe. This sounds a lot like
predestination to me.
Scott W. Somerville, Esq.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not
6 matches
Mail list logo
