On 27 June 2014 04:28, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *LizR
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
One way of
On 27 June 2014 07:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/26/2014 4:17 AM, LizR wrote:
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
Isn't that going to be true of any model that explains us in terms of
something simpler we can understand, whether it's strings or
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL
Email: kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
kmjco...@icloud.com
Mobile: 0450 963 719
Phone: 02 93894239
Web: http://www.eportfolio.kmjcommp.com
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education - Mark Twain
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:17 pm, 'Chris de
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:17 pm, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
To speak of thinking should first answer what is thought?
If you like. But you don't have to know what thought is to know how to think.
But you knew I was going to say that. If we
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
One way of looking at it. However it seems to me more apt to think of ourselves
as the loci of the consensus of our
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kim Jones
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: we are the narrators of our minds
On 26 Jun 2014, at 5:17 pm, 'Chris de
On 6/26/2014 4:17 AM, LizR wrote:
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
Isn't that going to be true of any model that explains us in terms of something simpler we
can understand, whether it's strings or arithmetic? It seems that the only kind of
explanation people
On 6/26/2014 9:28 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
*From:*everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *LizR
Yes, according to this view we are just along for the ride.
One way of looking at it. However it seems to me more apt to
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
On 6/26/2014 9:28 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Yes, according
On 6/26/2014 8:28 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
Given enough parallelism and time (between reboots) to evolve and build a memory, I
suspect a ghost would eventually emerge within the robot (given enough processing depth
and breadth), as… at some fuzzy threshold it began
11 matches
Mail list logo