Re: Marxism and the pursuit of money, sex and power

2012-08-31 Thread Craig Weinberg

On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:55:08 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:

  Hi Craig Weinberg 
  
 It's a non-brainer.
  
 The Marxist model of man and his government as being saintly and always
 thinking of the good of the whole flies in the face of reality. Here 
 in the real world, man goes out each day in his basic search for money, 
 sex, and power.


Maybe you are more familiar with Marx than I am, but my impression was that 
his view was not about men being saintly at all. To the contrary, it seems 
to be all about permanent class struggle and materialism - means of 
production and all that. He was all about the real world search for money, 
sex, and power. What Marx said about Capitalism may not have been wrong at 
all, but what he proposed as a solution didn't seem to be a lasting 
solution. It isn't often that ideas get half of the world to overthrow 
their leaders, so I would guess that they must have some pretty compelling 
reasoning to them and not Pollyanna tropes about man being saintly.

Craig

 

  
  
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net javascript:
 8/31/2012 
 Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him 
 so that everything could function.

 - Receiving the following content - 
 *From:* Craig Weinberg javascript: 
 *Receiver:* everything-list javascript: 
 *Time:* 2012-08-31, 08:28:11
 *Subject:* Re: No Chinese Room Necessary

  

 On Friday, August 31, 2012 4:14:37 AM UTC-4, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 



 2012/8/31 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com



 On Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:55:35 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: 

  On 8/30/2012 6:35 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:



 On Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:16:14 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: 

 Hi Craig,

 Umm, ever hear of the concept of Heaven? It sounds very much 
 like a a future society with a perfect anything or that morals were 
 unnecessary.


 Sure, but when does the Left Wing ever talk about Heaven?

 Craig 


 Hi Craig,

 Umm, the Marxists have an analogue...  
 classlesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_society, 
 moneyless, and statelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_society
  social order http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_order 
 structuredhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_and_superstructure
  upon common ownership http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership of 
 the means of productionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means_of_production, 
 as well as a social http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social, 
 politicalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political
  and econom**ic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy ideology that 
 aims at the establishment of this social order.


 When does the Left Wing ever talk about Marxism? Does Dennis Kucinich 
 talk about a stateless social order? Even self described socialists like 
 Bernie Sanders or activists like Michael Moore don't say we must get rid 
 of money and class!. All I have ever heard from progressives is We should 
 pay teachers more and useless businessmen less. and We should stop paying 
 private contractors so much to imprison more and more people on meaningless 
 drug charges. I have hung out with many anarchists, feminists, hippies, 
 and rabid left wing ideologues socially throughout my life and have never - 
 ever - heard anyone mention communism or Marxism in any kind of political 
 context at all. Most of what I know about Marxism has come from 
 Libertarians and Republicans holding up its ghost in effigy.


 Well you're not living in the right country then... And an anarchist who 
 would not talk about about a classless goal... well cannot be an 
 anarchist which means without hierarchy/authority not without rules, 
 that is anomie.


 What does where I live have to do with anything? Are you saying that only 
 people who want to see the US paved over and sold to WalMart are real 
 Americans? When I say that people I have known are anarchists I mean that 
 they have anarchic sympathies - not that they advocate a permanent 
 realization of total anarchy. 

 Craig

  
 Quentin
  


 Craig


  -- 
 Onward!

 Stephen
 http://webpages.charter.net/**stephenk1/Outlaw/Outlaw.html 
 http://webpages.charter.net/stephenk1/Outlaw/Outlaw.html

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Everything List group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/-We2MSfPkrkJ. 

 To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.




 -- 
 All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Everything List group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/uL-e1u4uJA8J.
 To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .

Re: Re: Marxism and the pursuit of money, sex and power

2012-08-31 Thread Craig Weinberg


On Friday, August 31, 2012 9:14:20 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:

  Right, but that's what communism asks you to do in effect. 
 Marx never used the word saintly or giving your life to the Cause,
 but that emphasis on others rather than self no doubt
 prompted Ayn Rand's (she was russian, presumably a victim of
 oppressive communist rule) reactionary paean to the virtues of self-esteen
 and selfishness.


Ayn Rand was the daughter of the owner of a successful pharmacy who had his 
business confiscated by the Bolsheviks when she was 12. It doesn't take too 
much to see how that would traumatize anyone, especially someone in her 
social position (not to stereotype her as a Jewish Russian Princess, but 
given her sense of pride later in life, I would not guess that she would be 
any less so as privileged teenager in cosmopolitan St. Petersberg). I think 
her animus toward communism was more personally driven by the loss of her 
expected life at the hands of low class peasants than anything else. Of 
course, I could be projecting - I don't know much about Rand except for 
reading Atlas Shrugged. I liked the idea of John Galt and all of that. I 
didn't realize at the time the implications or what was behind her views.

Craig

 
  
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net javascript: 
 Hi Craig Weinberg 
  8/31/2012 
 Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him 
 so that everything could function.

 - Receiving the following content - 
 *From:* Craig Weinberg javascript: 
 *Receiver:* everything-list javascript: 
 *Time:* 2012-08-31, 09:03:05
 *Subject:* Re: Marxism and the pursuit of money, sex and power

  
 On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:55:08 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote: 

  Hi Craig Weinberg 
  
 It's a non-brainer.
  
 The Marxist model of man and his government as being saintly and always
 thinking of the good of the whole flies in the face of reality. Here 
 in the real world, man goes out each day in his basic search for money, 
 sex, and power.


 Maybe you are more familiar with Marx than I am, but my impression was 
 that his view was not about men being saintly at all. To the contrary, it 
 seems to be all about permanent class struggle and materialism - means of 
 production and all that. He was all about the real world search for money, 
 sex, and power. What Marx said about Capitalism may not have been wrong at 
 all, but what he proposed as a solution didn't seem to be a lasting 
 solution. It isn't often that ideas get half of the world to overthrow 
 their leaders, so I would guess that they must have some pretty compelling 
 reasoning to them and not Pollyanna tropes about man being saintly.

 Craig

  

   
  
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
 8/31/2012 
 Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him 
 so that everything could function.

 - Receiving the following content - 
 *From:* Craig Weinberg 
 *Receiver:* everything-list 
 *Time:* 2012-08-31, 08:28:11
 *Subject:* Re: No Chinese Room Necessary

  

 On Friday, August 31, 2012 4:14:37 AM UTC-4, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 



 2012/8/31 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com



 On Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:55:35 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: 

  On 8/30/2012 6:35 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:



 On Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:16:14 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King 
 wrote: 

 Hi Craig,

 Umm, ever hear of the concept of Heaven? It sounds very much 
 like a a future society with a perfect anything or that morals were 
 unnecessary.


 Sure, but when does the Left Wing ever talk about Heaven?

 Craig 


 Hi Craig,

 Umm, the Marxists have an analogue...  
 classlesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_society, 
 moneyless, and statelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_society
  social order http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_order 
 structuredhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_and_superstructure
  upon common ownership http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership
  of the means of 
 productionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means_of_production, 
 as well as a social http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social, 
 politicalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political
  and econom**ic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy ideology that 
 aims at the establishment of this social order.


 When does the Left Wing ever talk about Marxism? Does Dennis Kucinich 
 talk about a stateless social order? Even self described socialists like 
 Bernie Sanders or activists like Michael Moore don't say we must get rid 
 of money and class!. All I have ever heard from progressives is We 
 should 
 pay teachers more and useless businessmen less. and We should stop 
 paying 
 private contractors so much to imprison more and more people on 
 meaningless 
 drug charges. I have hung out with many anarchists, feminists, hippies, 
 and rabid left wing ideologues socially throughout my life and have never 
 - 
 ever - heard anyone mention communism or Marxism in any kind of political 
 context at all. Most of what I know about Marxism has 

Re: Re: Marxism and the pursuit of money, sex and power

2012-08-31 Thread R AM
The L-Curve: A Graph of the US Income Distribution

http://www.lcurve.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.